I took this technology class to learn about the latest
cutting edge in technology and software.
I consider myself to be a “connected” teacher in that I have used
technology in my classroom since the Apple IIe arrived and I’ve always been
inspired by new innovations. But, this class has asked me to really look
at how technology is being integrated. Am
I using the device to really teach higher level thinking skills, or am I just
using technology to glorify technology without thinking about the results (SMAR
model of substitution, augmentation, modification and redefinition). I now explore the impact of integrating
technology on both teaching and learning.
I am teaching in a Blended or Flipped Classroom, not a 1:1 environment. Therefore, learning takes place with and
without technology.
Can’t I do Padlet on the blackboard using paper and
tape? Do I really need a computer? Is it more engaging for the class to
collaboratively participate in active learning the old-fashioned way? Technology standards attempts to outline a
progression that educators follow in their journey toward redefining teaching
and learning with technology. It’s more
fun to do Padlet than to post pencil/paper replies on the real classroom wall
or blackboard, but it’s not any higher level in Bloom’s taxonomy. Students may be more motivated to engage in
class discussion if they are typing their response in Padlet and seeing it
project through the In-Focus projector, but what are they really learning?
Kids can see through learning for the sake of using the
devices daily and if the learning is not active and engaging, they will grow
tired of the new shiny device. Teachers
feel pressure to show they are using the new technology in their lesson plans,
but are we really modifying and redefining or just substituting? These are hard questions and have made me stop
and examine how really innovative my classroom is.
Some technology class members have expressed opinions about
the digital natives (younger teachers and students) and the non-natives (the
veterans who did not grow up with electronic devices). I don’t really think age has anything to do
with success in technology one way or the other. Focus and intent are the most important
variables. A digital native can be
totally unconnected to the environment around him and clueless about his
digital reputation as he feels entitled to do or say whatever. A non-digital native may have to try harder
to be comfortable with the devices, but if the desire and interest is there,
he/she should not be written off because of the generation in which he/she grew
up. The veteran set can be just as hip
and because they have to try harder since it doesn’t come naturally to them,
they may see faults in the implementation that the younger set doesn’t even
think about. I’ve seen both younger and
veteran teachers become uncomfortable using devices or technology in the
classroom. Engaging students in
technology with a specific purpose that rises above simply making paper/pencil
worksheets into digital worksheets is certainly the first step. Basic classroom management will also play a
huge factor whether the environment is 1:1 or Blended.
Since I teach English 10, a large focus of my job is
preparing students to pass the End of Course Assessment (graduation test). I encourage creative thinking. Every unit covered has an essential
question. Sometimes students may
discover “new” essential questions as there are many different ways to look at
curriculum and no absolutely right answer.
I’m not teaching math, where 2 plus 2 always equals 4. I’m teaching values, ethics, character
development and obligation. While some
students may think that Brutus was noble when he listened to the conspirators
and tried to save his city from Caesar, others think he should have seen them
for what they were and saved his best friend.
Is it possible to teach students critical thinking and technology skills
and still prepare them for the knowledge based state tests? I think the SMAR model applies well. I can ramp up the content by having the
students analyze and evaluate. When they
do that and collaboratively create a final presentation for the class, the
learning sticks. Sometimes they create
an amusement park flyer using Publisher that includes creative rides (the
Fountain of Fire) and interesting restaurants.
Sometimes they write Shrink poems about the characters. Occasionally, the Ghost of Caesar makes an
appearance, but they are taking elements of the play and redefining them.
The concept of collaborative learning, the grouping and
pairing of students for the purpose of achieving an academic goal, may be
accomplished using various Google Doc applications, but in a blended classroom
such as mine sitting around the table and talking in small groups while putting
together a class project does not require a computer. Active learning occurs with or without the
devices as the students are engaged in the learning. The group includes students at various levels
working together in small groups toward a common goal with each choosing a
level of expertise suited to their chosen task.
The artistic student chooses to create something hands-on, the writer
chooses to work on the speech or script, and the student gifted in speaking to
the class takes on the task of bringing the project “to life” for the class
presentation. The students are responsible for one another's learning as well
as their own. Thus, the success of one student helps other students to be
successful.
How can we teach students to demonstrate their
mastery/understanding when they aren't given explicit requirements? Although Ben Johnson and Lindsey Wright both
advocate turning the classroom over to students and letting them decide what to
teach and learn, my school is far from that philosophy. I give them rubrics which are open-ended
enough that they may collaborate, analyze, evaluate, and organize products or
projects while following the state standards and the curriculum for my
class. As with Julius Caesar, there are
many different options they may use to think critically and create, but they have
stated parameters about what an exceptional product/project should contain. It will be at least a year before my school
system goes 1:1, or longer, but there will have to be a major shift in the
management of schools and how education is implemented in Indiana before the
classroom instruction is turned over to the students without explicit
requirements.
This post reflects the heart of the course's intent! Beautiful, Pat! : >
ReplyDelete